Skullcandy Crusher review
May 14, 2020
If you are going to buy a solid pair of headphones, spend a few minutes on reading this Skullcandy C...
Read MoreSkullcandy Crusher vs Beats Solo3 is a couple of wireless devices that also have an additional audio cable. The wearing style of the first headphones is over-ear while the others are on-ear. Both of them are closed back and without noise canceling.
The impedance of Skullcandy Crusher is 33 Ohm. When the headphones Beats Solo3 are used with a wire, their impedance is 37 Ohm. Also, Skullcandy Crusher has a 20 Hz - 20 kHz frequency response and 90 dB of sensitivity. Both devices have no aptX and NFC support.
In order to use Beats Solo3 for 40 hours, you have to spend 2 hours for charging. The headphones of both models have a battery-free listening mode.
Bass which you get with Skullcandy Crusher can go far too high, even for those who like it. The headphones offer decent stereo separation.
Sound is incredibly crisp and clear on the Solo3 Wireless, it feels especially at higher volumes. The bass is strong, which is no surprise, but it's not overpowering at all.
Skullcandy Crusher weighs 275 g which is 60 g heavier than Beats Solo3, as their weight is 215 g. The first pair of headphones comes with 120 cm-long audio cable, while the second one has 130 cm-length. As far as build materials of Skullcandy Crusher go, there is some metal and quite a lot of plastic — however, the plastic is very high-quality and seems strong.
These appliances are foldable and have an adjustable headband. They have built-in microphone and control buttons.
May 14, 2020
If you are going to buy a solid pair of headphones, spend a few minutes on reading this Skullcandy C...
Read More
May 18, 2020
Beats has made lots of great headphones. Here I am going to show you my Beats Solo3 review that incl...
Read More